HEAD-TO-HEAD
Two-column comparison of Emballage Indberetning and ERP DK published packaging EPR rates in Denmark, each figure linked to its source.
Emballage Indberetning and ERP DK both run packaging EPR compliance in Denmark. Of 11 directly comparable material categories, Emballage Indberetning is lower in 11 and ERP DK in 0. The biggest single gap is Paper and cardboard (non-household packaging), where Emballage Indberetning is 60% cheaper than ERP DK (0.40 vs 0.99 DKK/kg). Gramta keeps both tariffs sourced and dated, reviewed 11 Aug 2026.
Dataset reviewed 11 Aug 2026
Reviewed by Daniel VaknineEach row is one material family in one published scope – scopes are never mixed. Where a scheme prices several tiers of the same family (colour, recyclability, format), the cell shows its range; expand the row to see every underlying sourced line. An empty cell means that scheme publishes no comparable rate there.
| Material or tariff line | Emballage IndberetningSource | ERP DKSource | Show the underlying tariff lines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper and cardboardHousehold | 0.11 – 5.29 DKK/kglowest3 tariff lines | 0.22 – 5.69 DKK/kg3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Paper and cardboard, Household packaging |
|
| |
| Paper and cardboardCommercial | 0.40 – 6.74 DKK/kglowest3 tariff lines | 0.99 – 8.20 DKK/kg3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Paper and cardboard, Non-household packaging |
|
| |
| PlasticHousehold | 3.79 DKK/kglowest | 4.25 DKK/kg | |
| PlasticCommercial | 1.47 DKK/kglowest | 2.59 DKK/kg | |
| GlassHousehold | 2.39 DKK/kglowest | 3.62 DKK/kg | |
| GlassCommercial | 1.17 DKK/kglowest | 2.43 DKK/kg | |
| AluminiumHousehold | 3.29 DKK/kglowest | 3.80 DKK/kg | |
| AluminiumCommercial | 0.53 DKK/kglowest | 0.81 DKK/kg | |
| Steel and other metalsHousehold | 3.29 DKK/kglowest | 3.80 DKK/kg | |
| Steel and other metalsCommercial | 0.53 DKK/kglowest | 0.81 DKK/kg | |
| WoodHousehold | No comparable published rate | 2.11 DKK/kg | |
| WoodCommercial | 0.64 DKK/kglowest | 0.85 DKK/kg |
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
| PRO or scheme | Minimum and base fees |
|---|---|
| Emballage Indberetning | 995 DKK per year |
| ERP DK | 1,900 DKK per year |
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaYes – on current published rates Emballage Indberetning is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 11 of 11 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 11 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Paper and cardboard (non-household packaging), where Emballage Indberetning is 60% cheaper (0.40 vs ERP DK's 0.99 DKK/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and review date (11 Aug 2026 for this page). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.