HEAD-TO-HEAD
Two-column comparison of Citeo and Leko published packaging EPR rates in France, each figure linked to its source.
Citeo and Leko both run packaging EPR compliance in France – and on current published rates there is nothing between them: all 4 directly comparable categories are identical, so minimum fees, scopes and contract terms decide. Gramta keeps both tariffs sourced and dated; the dataset was updated 22 Aug 2026.
Dataset updated 22 Aug 2026
Maintained by Daniel VaknineEach row is one material family in one published scope – scopes are never mixed. Where a scheme prices several tiers of the same family (colour, recyclability, format), the cell shows its range; expand the row to see every underlying sourced line. An empty cell means that scheme publishes no comparable rate there.
| Material or tariff line | CiteoSourceHousehold | LekoHousehold | Show the underlying tariff lines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper and cardboardSame rateHousehold | 0.47 EUR/kg | 0.47 EUR/kgSource | |
| PlasticHousehold | 0.70 – 2.10 EUR/kg13 tariff lines | 0.67 – 2.01 EUR/kg16 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, Household packaging |
|
| |
| Plastic | No comparable published rate | 0.083 – 0.22 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, Professional, commercial and industrial packaging | |||
| GlassHousehold | No comparable published rate | 0.02 EUR/kgSource | |
| AluminiumSame rateHousehold | 0.24 EUR/kg | 0.24 EUR/kgSource | |
| Steel and other metalsHousehold | 0.065 – 1.05 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | 0.065 EUR/kg | |
Tariff lines: Steel and other metals, Household packaging |
|
| |
| WoodSame rateHousehold | 0.26 EUR/kg | 0.26 EUR/kgSource | |
| Wood | No comparable published rate | 0.0081 EUR/kgSource | |
| CeramicsHousehold | No comparable published rate | 0.74 EUR/kgSource | |
| TextilesSame rateHousehold | 1.05 EUR/kg | 1.05 EUR/kgSource |
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
| PRO or scheme | Minimum and base fees |
|---|---|
| Citeo | ≈ €110/yr |
| Leko | ≈ €95/yr |
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaOn current published rates there is nothing between them: all 4 directly comparable categories are identical. The choice comes down to minimum and membership fees, packaging scopes and contract terms – both schemes' published terms are linked above.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and checked date (dataset updated 22 Aug 2026). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.