PRO PRICE COMPARISON
Published per-kilogram rates from every comparable Finland scheme in one view – same material, same published scope, each figure linked to its source.
In Finland, the PRO you register with changes the bill. For wood (consumer packaging), Suomen Pakkaustuottajat charges 0.0021 EUR per kilogram while Sumi charges 0.0039 EUR – 86% more for the same category. Gramta compares 12 like-for-like material rates across 2 schemes; the dataset was updated 24 Aug 2026.
Last full review 22 Aug 2026
The largest like-for-like gaps in the current dataset – same material family, same published scope, and one scheme cheaper on every published tier.
Each row is one material family in one published scope – scopes are never mixed. Where a scheme prices several tiers of the same family (colour, recyclability, format), the cell shows its range; expand the row to see every underlying sourced line. An empty cell means that scheme publishes no comparable rate there.
| Material or tariff line | SumiSource | Suomen PakkaustuottajatSource | Show the underlying tariff lines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper and cardboardHousehold | 0.079 – 0.29 EUR/kg6 tariff lines | 0.079 – 0.24 EUR/kg4 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Paper and cardboard, Consumer packaging |
|
| |
| Paper and cardboard | 0.0065 – 0.19 EUR/kg8 tariff lines | 0.003 – 0.19 EUR/kg3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Paper and cardboard, Non-household packaging |
|
| |
| PlasticHousehold | 0.28 – 0.59 EUR/kg5 tariff lines | 0.21 – 0.36 EUR/kg3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, Consumer packaging |
|
| |
| Plastic | 0.081 – 0.40 EUR/kg5 tariff lines | 0.065 – 0.27 EUR/kg3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, Non-household packaging |
|
| |
| GlassHousehold | 0.14 – 0.17 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | 0.076 – 0.097 EUR/kglowest2 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Glass, Consumer packaging |
|
| |
| Glass | 0.074 – 0.095 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | 0.044 – 0.064 EUR/kglowest2 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Glass, Non-household packaging |
|
| |
| AluminiumHousehold | 0.095 – 0.19 EUR/kg3 tariff lines | 0.029 – 0.063 EUR/kglowest3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Aluminium, Consumer packaging |
|
| |
| Aluminium | 0.025 – 0.073 EUR/kg3 tariff lines | 0.015 – 0.024 EUR/kglowest3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Aluminium, Non-household packaging |
|
| |
| Steel and other metalsHousehold | 0.095 – 0.19 EUR/kg5 tariff lines | 0.029 – 0.063 EUR/kglowest3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Steel and other metals, Consumer packaging |
|
| |
| Steel and other metals | 0.025 – 0.073 EUR/kg5 tariff lines | 0.015 – 0.024 EUR/kglowest3 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Steel and other metals, Non-household packaging |
|
| |
| WoodHousehold | 0.0039 EUR/kg | 0.0021 EUR/kglowest | |
| Wood | 0.0014 – 0.0022 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | 0.0016 – 0.0021 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | |
Tariff lines: Wood, Non-household packaging |
|
|
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
All Finland rates and calculatorAll EU PRO comparisons and how to choose
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
| PRO or scheme | Minimum and base fees |
|---|---|
| Sumi | ≈ €39/yr |
| Suomen Pakkaustuottajat | ≈ €74/yr |
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaNo scheme is cheapest for every material, so it depends on your mix. Across 12 directly comparable categories, Suomen Pakkaustuottajat charges the lowest rate most often (7 of 12 categories). Check the rows above against your own packaging, then the minimum fees – a low per-kilogram rate can be outweighed by a higher minimum.
Yes – on current published rates Suomen Pakkaustuottajat is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 7 of 7 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Aluminium (consumer packaging), where Suomen Pakkaustuottajat is 69% cheaper (0.029 vs Sumi's 0.095 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and checked date (dataset updated 24 Aug 2026). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.