PRO PRICE COMPARISON
Published per-kilogram rates from every comparable Lithuania scheme in one view – same material, same published scope, each figure linked to its source.
In Lithuania, the compared schemes currently publish identical per-kilogram rates in every category they both make public – on price alone there is nothing between them, so minimum fees, packaging scopes and contract terms decide. Gramta compares 7 material rates side by side, reviewed 11 Aug 2026.
Each row is one material family in one published scope – scopes are never mixed. Where a scheme prices several tiers of the same family (colour, recyclability, format), the cell shows its range; expand the row to see every underlying sourced line. An empty cell means that scheme publishes no comparable rate there.
3 of the 7 rows below could not be compared: only one scheme publishes a rate for that material and scope, so it is shown for completeness rather than ranked.
| Material or tariff line | Gamtos AteitisSource | Zaliasis TaskasSource | Show the underlying tariff lines |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper and cardboardSame rateAll packaging in the published scope | 0.99 EUR/kg | 0.99 EUR/kg | |
| PlasticSame rateAll packaging in the published scope | 0.99 EUR/kg | 0.99 EUR/kg | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, All packaging in the published scope |
|
| |
| GlassAll packaging in the published scope | No comparable published rate | 0.99 EUR/kg | |
| AluminiumAll packaging in the published scope | No comparable published rate | 0.99 EUR/kg | |
| Steel and other metalsAll packaging in the published scope | No comparable published rate | 0.99 EUR/kg | |
| Composite packagingSame rateAll packaging in the published scope | 0.99 EUR/kg | 0.99 EUR/kg | |
| WoodSame rateAll packaging in the published scope | 0.99 EUR/kg | 0.99 EUR/kg |
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
All Lithuania rates and calculatorAll EU PRO comparisons and how to choose
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
None of the compared Lithuania schemes publishes a minimum or base fee in the current dataset – the per-kilogram rates above are the whole published price.
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaOn current published rates there is no per-kilogram difference to exploit in Lithuania: every directly comparable category is identical between the compared schemes. The decision comes down to minimum and membership fees, packaging scopes and contract terms – all listed above with sources.
On current published rates there is nothing between them: all 4 directly comparable categories are identical. The choice comes down to minimum and membership fees, packaging scopes and contract terms – both schemes' published terms are linked above.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and review date (11 Aug 2026 for this page). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.