PRO PRICE COMPARISON
Published per-kilogram rates from every comparable Spain scheme in one view – same material, same published scope, each figure linked to its source.
In Spain, the PRO you register with changes the bill. For plastic (industrial packaging), Envalora charges 0.015 EUR per kilogram while Sigre charges 0.15 EUR – 900% more for the same category. Gramta compares 40 like-for-like material rates across 9 schemes; the dataset was updated 24 Aug 2026.
Last full review 22 Aug 2026 · Latest partial review 24 Aug 2026
The largest like-for-like gaps in the current dataset – same material family, same published scope, and one scheme cheaper on every published tier.
With 9 schemes, a side-by-side grid stops being readable, so each material family is ranked from the lowest to the highest published rate in the same scope. Ranges mean the scheme prices several tiers of that family; expand to see the underlying sourced lines.
10 of the 40 rows below could not be compared: only one scheme publishes a rate for that material and scope, so it is shown for completeness rather than ranked.
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
All Spain rates and calculatorAll EU PRO comparisons and how to choose
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
| PRO or scheme | Minimum and base fees |
|---|---|
| Genci | ≈ €100/yr |
| Procircular | ≈ €150/yr |
| Punto Greta | ≈ €150/yr |
| Envalora | ≈ €250/yr |
| Sun Repack | ≈ €256/yr |
| Carton Circular | ≈ €350/yr |
| Aevae | ≈ €1,250/yr |
| Sigfito | ≈ €1,500/yr |
| No published fee or base fee | |
| Ambienvases | — |
| Ecoembes | — |
| Ecoembes Commercial | — |
| Ecolec Envases | — |
| Ecotic Envases | — |
| Ecovidrio | — |
| Implica | — |
| Recyclia Envases | — |
| Sigre | — |
| Ubica | — |
These Spain schemes are in the dataset but can't sit in a per-kilogram comparison without misleading you. Every one of their published lines is on the Spain fee page with its source.
Official name: AEVAE
Publishes too few material rates that overlap with the other schemes for a fair side-by-side.
Official name: AMBIENVASES
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
Official name: Cartón Circular
Publishes rates, but none are standalone per-kilogram material rates.
Official name: Ecoembes (envases comerciales)
Publishes too few material rates that overlap with the other schemes for a fair side-by-side.
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
Prices per sales unit, package or transaction rather than per kilogram, so its rates can't sit in a per-kg row.
Official name: Recyclia Envases / Recyenvases
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
Official name: SIGFITO
Publishes too few material rates that overlap with the other schemes for a fair side-by-side.
Official name: UBICA Envases
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaNo scheme is cheapest for every material, so it depends on your mix. Across 30 directly comparable categories, the lowest rate moves between schemes: Ecotic Envases lowest in 6, Envalora lowest in 3, Genci lowest in 2, Procircular lowest in 2. Check the rows above against your own packaging, then the minimum fees – a low per-kilogram rate can be outweighed by a higher minimum.
Yes – on current published rates Envalora is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 3 of 4 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Plastic (industrial packaging), where Envalora is 90% cheaper (0.015 vs Sigre's 0.15 EUR/kg). 1 categories are identical. Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
It depends on the material. Ecotic Envases charges less for 8 of 10 directly comparable categories – for Ceramics (industrial packaging) it is 89% cheaper (0.012 vs Sun Repack's 0.11 EUR/kg). Sun Repack charges less for 2, led by Aluminium (commercial packaging) where it is 33% cheaper (0.02 vs Ecotic Envases's 0.03 EUR/kg). In 2 categories the schemes' tiered ranges overlap, so neither side can honestly be called lower there. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
It depends on the material. Ecotic Envases charges less for 2 of 5 directly comparable categories – for Wood (commercial packaging) it is 27% cheaper (0.011 vs Envalora's 0.015 EUR/kg). Envalora charges less for 3, led by Plastic (industrial packaging) where it is 88% cheaper (0.015 vs Ecotic Envases's 0.12 EUR/kg). Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
It depends on the material. Genci charges less for 6 of 9 directly comparable categories – for Paper and cardboard (industrial packaging) it is 54% cheaper (0.017 vs Sun Repack's 0.037 EUR/kg). Sun Repack charges less for 3, led by Cork (commercial packaging) where it is 85% cheaper (0.015 vs Genci's 0.10 EUR/kg). In 7 categories the schemes' tiered ranges overlap, so neither side can honestly be called lower there. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
It depends on the material. Genci charges less for 1 of 5 directly comparable categories – for Paper and cardboard (industrial packaging) it is 29% cheaper (0.017 vs Procircular's 0.024 EUR/kg). Procircular charges less for 4, led by Wood (commercial packaging) where it is 69% cheaper (0.012 vs Genci's 0.039 EUR/kg). In 5 categories the schemes' tiered ranges overlap, so neither side can honestly be called lower there. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
Yes – on current published rates Implica is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 2 of 2 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Paper and cardboard (industrial packaging), where Implica is 55% cheaper (0.032 vs Punto Greta's 0.07 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and checked date (dataset updated 24 Aug 2026). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.