PRO PRICE COMPARISON
Published per-kilogram rates from every comparable Slovakia scheme in one view – same material, same published scope, each figure linked to its source.
In Slovakia, the PRO you register with changes the bill. For aluminium (mixed household and non-household packaging), First Eastern OZV charges 0.13 EUR per kilogram while Reclay SK charges 0.26 EUR – 108% more for the same category. Gramta compares 17 like-for-like material rates across 7 schemes; the dataset was updated 24 Aug 2026.
Last full review 22 Aug 2026 · Latest partial review 24 Aug 2026
The largest like-for-like gaps in the current dataset – same material family, same published scope, and one scheme cheaper on every published tier.
With 7 schemes, a side-by-side grid stops being readable, so each material family is ranked from the lowest to the highest published rate in the same scope. Ranges mean the scheme prices several tiers of that family; expand to see the underlying sourced lines.
1 of the 17 rows below could not be compared: only one scheme publishes a rate for that material and scope, so it is shown for completeness rather than ranked.
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
All Slovakia rates and calculatorAll EU PRO comparisons and how to choose
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
| PRO or scheme | Minimum and base fees |
|---|---|
| Natur Pack | ≈ €100/yrfrom 25 EUR per quarter |
| No published fee or base fee | |
| Asekol SK | — |
| E Cycling | — |
| Elekos | — |
| Envi PAK | — |
| First Eastern OZV | — |
| Nowas | — |
| Reclay SK | — |
| Sewa | — |
These Slovakia schemes are in the dataset but can't sit in a per-kilogram comparison without misleading you. Every one of their published lines is on the Slovakia fee page with its source.
Official name: NOWAS
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
Official name: SEWA, a.s.
Publishes too few material rates that overlap with the other schemes for a fair side-by-side.
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaNo scheme is cheapest for every material, so it depends on your mix. Across 16 directly comparable categories, the lowest rate moves between schemes: First Eastern OZV lowest in 6, E Cycling lowest in 3, Asekol SK lowest in 2, Elekos lowest in 1. Check the rows above against your own packaging, then the minimum fees – a low per-kilogram rate can be outweighed by a higher minimum.
Yes – on current published rates First Eastern OZV is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 9 of 9 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Aluminium (mixed household and non-household packaging), where First Eastern OZV is 52% cheaper (0.13 vs Reclay SK's 0.26 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
Yes – on current published rates E Cycling is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 6 of 6 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Wood (all packaging in the published scope), where E Cycling is 49% cheaper (0.069 vs Natur Pack's 0.13 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
Yes – on current published rates Elekos is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 6 of 6 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Aluminium (mixed household and non-household packaging), where Elekos is 46% cheaper (0.14 vs Reclay SK's 0.26 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
It depends on the material. Asekol SK charges less for 5 of 6 directly comparable categories – for Wood (all packaging in the published scope) it is 34% cheaper (0.095 vs Natur Pack's 0.14 EUR/kg). Natur Pack charges less for 1, led by Glass (all packaging in the published scope) where it is 5% cheaper (0.12 vs Asekol SK's 0.13 EUR/kg). Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
Yes – on current published rates E Cycling is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 6 of 6 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 24 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Wood (all packaging in the published scope), where E Cycling is 31% cheaper (0.069 vs Envi PAK's 0.10 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
It depends on the material. Asekol SK charges less for 4 of 5 directly comparable categories – for Aluminium (all packaging in the published scope) it is 21% cheaper (0.12 vs Envi PAK's 0.15 EUR/kg). Envi PAK charges less for 1, led by Glass (all packaging in the published scope) where it is 12% cheaper (0.11 vs Asekol SK's 0.13 EUR/kg). In 1 categories the schemes' tiered ranges overlap, so neither side can honestly be called lower there. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and checked date (dataset updated 24 Aug 2026). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.