PRO PRICE COMPARISON
Published per-kilogram rates from every comparable Slovakia scheme in one view – same material, same published scope, each figure linked to its source.
In Slovakia, the 5 comparable schemes publish similar per-kilogram rates – the largest like-for-like gap in the current dataset is +42%. Gramta compares 11 material rates side by side, reviewed 11 Aug 2026, so you can verify that for your own mix.
The largest like-for-like gaps in the current dataset – same material family, same published scope, and one scheme cheaper on every published tier.
Each row is one material family in one published scope – scopes are never mixed. Where a scheme prices several tiers of the same family (colour, recyclability, format), the cell shows its range; expand the row to see every underlying sourced line. An empty cell means that scheme publishes no comparable rate there.
1 of the 11 rows below could not be compared: only one scheme publishes a rate for that material and scope, so it is shown for completeness rather than ranked.
| Material or tariff line | Asekol SKSource | Envi PAKSource | First Eastern OZVSource | Natur PackSource | Reclay SKSource | Show the underlying tariff lines |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper and cardboardAll packaging in the published scopeAll packaging in the published scope | 0.11 – 0.30 EUR/kg4 tariff lines | 0.12 – 0.32 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.11 – 0.30 EUR/kg4 tariff lines | 0.14 EUR/kg | |
Tariff lines: Paper and cardboard, All packaging in the published scope |
|
|
|
| ||
| Paper and cardboardMixed household and non-household packagingMixed household and non-household packaging | No comparable published rate | No comparable published rate | 0.10 EUR/kglowest | No comparable published rate | 0.14 EUR/kg | |
Tariff lines: Paper and cardboard, Mixed household and non-household packaging |
|
| ||||
| Paper and cardboardNon-packaging products covered by the published feeNon-packaging products covered by the published fee | No comparable published rate | No comparable published rate | 0.099 EUR/kglowest | No comparable published rate | 0.11 EUR/kg | |
| PlasticAll packaging in the published scopeAll packaging in the published scope | 0.29 EUR/kglowest | 0.34 – 0.38 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.30 – 0.31 EUR/kg6 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, All packaging in the published scope |
|
|
| |||
| PlasticMixed household and non-household packagingMixed household and non-household packaging | No comparable published rate | No comparable published rate | 0.29 – 0.30 EUR/kglowest2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.36 EUR/kg | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, Mixed household and non-household packaging |
|
| ||||
| PlasticNon-packaging products covered by the published feeNon-packaging products covered by the published fee | No comparable published rate | No comparable published rate | 0.26 – 0.27 EUR/kglowest2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.36 EUR/kg | |
Tariff lines: Plastic, Non-packaging products covered by the published fee |
|
| ||||
| GlassAll packaging in the published scope | 0.13 EUR/kg | 0.11 – 0.12 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.11 EUR/kglowest | No comparable published rate | |
Tariff lines: Glass, All packaging in the published scope |
|
|
| |||
| AluminiumAll packaging in the published scope | 0.12 EUR/kglowest | 0.14 – 0.15 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.14 EUR/kg | No comparable published rate | |
Tariff lines: Aluminium, All packaging in the published scope |
|
|
| |||
| Steel and other metalsAll packaging in the published scope | 0.12 EUR/kglowest | 0.14 – 0.15 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.14 EUR/kg | No comparable published rate | |
Tariff lines: Steel and other metals, All packaging in the published scope |
|
|
| |||
| WoodAll packaging in the published scopeAll packaging in the published scope | 0.095 EUR/kglowest | 0.10 – 0.10 EUR/kg2 tariff lines | No comparable published rate | 0.11 EUR/kg | No comparable published rate | |
Tariff lines: Wood, All packaging in the published scope |
|
|
| |||
| WoodMixed household and non-household packagingMixed household and non-household packaging | No comparable published rate | No comparable published rate | 0.099 EUR/kg | No comparable published rate | No comparable published rate |
“Lowest” marks the scheme that is cheaper on every published tier of that category, at the precision shown. Ties and mixed results get no marker.
All Slovakia rates and calculatorAll EU PRO comparisons and how to choose
Add the materials you place on the market and a yearly weight for each. Gramta multiplies every scheme's current published rate, so you see the yearly difference in real money – not per-kilogram abstractions.
Add a material and a yearly weight to see each scheme's total.
Minimum, membership and base fees apply on top of (or instead of) per-kilogram rates, and they are comparable across every scheme regardless of tariff structure. Terms differ – some are annual, some one-off – so check each source.
| PRO or scheme | Minimum and base fees |
|---|---|
| Natur Pack | 25 EUR per quarter |
No published minimum or base fee in the current dataset for: Asekol SK, Envi PAK, First Eastern OZV, Reclay SK, E Cycling, Elekos, Nowas, Sewa.
These Slovakia schemes are in the dataset but can't sit in a per-kilogram comparison without misleading you. Every one of their published lines is on the Slovakia fee page with its source.
Official name: E-cycling
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
Official name: ELEKOS
Publishes too few material rates that overlap with the other schemes for a fair side-by-side.
Official name: NOWAS
Publishes no current public rates – pricing is by quote or contract.
Official name: SEWA, a.s.
Publishes too few material rates that overlap with the other schemes for a fair side-by-side.
The comparison above is one country, one year, per-kilogram rates only. Filing for real means classifying every product's packaging, applying minimums and modulation, and repeating it for every country you sell into – every year.
Send us your sales and your packaging details once. Gramta works out the fees for every country you sell in and keeps each report up to date and ready to file.
Get started with GramtaNo scheme is cheapest for every material, so it depends on your mix. Across 10 directly comparable categories, the lowest rate moves between schemes: Asekol SK lowest in 4, First Eastern OZV lowest in 4, Natur Pack lowest in 1. Check the rows above against your own packaging, then the minimum fees – a low per-kilogram rate can be outweighed by a higher minimum.
Yes – on current published rates First Eastern OZV is the cheaper choice: it charges less in 4 of 4 directly comparable categories and more in none (as of 11 Aug 2026). The biggest gap is Paper and cardboard (mixed household and non-household packaging), where First Eastern OZV is 29% cheaper (0.10 vs Reclay SK's 0.14 EUR/kg). Minimum fees and packaging scopes still differ, so confirm both against the linked tariffs before deciding.
It depends on the material. Asekol SK charges less for 4 of 5 directly comparable categories – for Aluminium (all packaging in the published scope) it is 21% cheaper (0.12 vs Envi PAK's 0.15 EUR/kg). Envi PAK charges less for 1, led by Glass (all packaging in the published scope) where it is 12% cheaper (0.11 vs Asekol SK's 0.13 EUR/kg). In 1 categories the schemes' tiered ranges overlap, so neither side can honestly be called lower there. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
It depends on the material. Asekol SK charges less for 4 of 6 directly comparable categories – for Steel and other metals (all packaging in the published scope) it is 14% cheaper (0.12 vs Natur Pack's 0.14 EUR/kg). Natur Pack charges less for 1, led by Glass (all packaging in the published scope) where it is 13% cheaper (0.11 vs Asekol SK's 0.13 EUR/kg). 1 categories are identical. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
It depends on the material. Envi PAK charges less for 1 of 5 directly comparable categories – for Wood (all packaging in the published scope) it is 8% cheaper (0.10 vs Natur Pack's 0.11 EUR/kg). Natur Pack charges less for 4, led by Glass (all packaging in the published scope) where it is 9% cheaper (0.11 vs Envi PAK's 0.12 EUR/kg). In 1 categories the schemes' tiered ranges overlap, so neither side can honestly be called lower there. Weigh your own material mix in the table – every figure links to its source.
Usually you can choose, but not on the per-kilogram rate alone. Schemes differ in packaging scopes, minimum and membership fees, eco-modulation tiers and contract terms, and some only accept certain packaging streams. Use the comparison to shortlist, then confirm scope and total cost against the scheme's own tariff – every rate here links to it.
Every rate is a published tariff line from the scheme itself, held in Gramta's sourced fee dataset with its effective period and review date (11 Aug 2026 for this page). Nothing is averaged or estimated: identical material families in identical published scopes are placed side by side, and anything not like-for-like is excluded and explained above.